The goblins are on a hill, concealed in a copse of trees. Now take the same goblins and stick them a football field away from the party across an open meadow. Now, imagine a party of five standard PCs walk in the door, of some appropriate level. Now put them in the middle of a thirty-foot square room. It does make rogues a bit more powerful but along with the optional rule Facing (which means you would only apply your shield AC in an arc), makes combat much more tactical.Įncounters, even 'easy' challenges can be much more difficult in the right situations. 251) about Flanking, which your DM might be interested in. There's also an optional rule in the DMG (pg. Honestly, even as the party 'tank', you won't be able to get in the way of everyone. It also means that your DM might be thinking that the only way encounters can resolve themselves is straight on combat resolution, which is certainly not the case. CR is very subjective based on situation, so you're correct in saying that it may end up getting other PCs killed. That is a dangerous path they're suggesting, depending on how much they increase the challenge, and what challenges are presented. I guess my question is, would using this spell to turn myself into an unstoppable juggernaut drive the poor man over the edge, and, should I do it anyways? I just realized I have access to Shield of Faith, which would temporarily buff me to AC 24. I generally literally stand between the others and any threats, which is pretty much core concept of paladin combat, but. I'm the only meat-shield in the party, which consists of me, a sorcerer, two lightly armored clerics, and a rogue. I jokingly suggested that he take some of my AC away (probably the magic bracers), and he said that No, he'd just increase the CR - but anything that would damage me would straight up kill the other party members. I'm wearing plate armor, a shield, and a pair of magical bracers that give me another +2 AC - with a total of 22. In our last game, he seemed a little flabbergasted at how hard it was to damage me while we confronted a group of orcs (I was attacked no less than six times, and not one of them scratched my armor). AB: 93 ATR: 19-24 Psn Dmg LVL: 23, Shadowknight only Bow of Shadows ATK: 118-126 WGT: 5.0 AB: 121.
Non-Magic Items crowbar (3 gp), 10 darts (S-M: 1d3 L: 1d2 ROF: 3 Range: 1.5/3/4.I'm a little worried I'm stressing out my DM. 4% block is nothing to scoff at, if you think blocking sucks, just look at a styleen's. If you wore bracers and this neck versus medallion of steadfast might, I would give it to this purely because pure defense isn't all that's needed on a tank. Re: Amulet of Mage Armor - What rarity would it be? Why does it need to cast the spell? You could make it an attuned item with the language, 'while you are wearing and attuned to this item and you are not wearing armor or wielding a shield, your Armor Class becomes 13 + your Dexterity modifier.' It's assumed that you'd be wearing the bracers with this neck. Armor Modifiers (PH (1996) 120) become an optional rule that's even vaguer than in AD&D, AD&D, in this case, providing more guidance than its followup. Magic Items bracers of defense AC 5, magic-user scroll of stoneskin, potion of fire resistance (immune to natural fire -2 damage/die from extreme and magical heat with +4 saves 1 turn duration), +1 quarterstaff (S-M: 1d6 L: 1d6 length: 7' space required: 3' speed factor: 4), +1 ring of protection (-1 AC +1 saving throws), wand of wonder (93 charges)Ĭlothing belt (3 sp), cap (1 sp), cloak (5 sp), low soft boots (8 sp), robe (6 sp) Note that the AD&D 2E, the description of the bracers remains largely unchanged (DMG (1993) 162), but the rules for Weapon Types vs.
#Bracers of defense (rare, dmg 156) download
Bracers Of Defense (rare Dmg 156) Download.
0 kommentar(er)
